| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] |
61. A simple question for all candidates : why you ? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
It's a short question, but one very tough to answer. And even harder to answer it as short and to the point as possible. In as few words as you can manage (single, short phrase would be preferrable), describe what do YOU think sets YOU apart from...
- by Akita T - at 2008.05.03 16:35:00
|
62. Candidates: Your stance on the EVE economy - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
The economy in itself is pretty much ok-ish. What I'd be really interested in is in the candidates' views on: a) the desirable average "expert" income levels (i.e. "reward") with regards to system security (i.e. "risk") for the major grind-li...
- by Akita T - at 2008.05.03 16:00:00
|
63. What is EvE? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Ramruqai seems to me most of them have it wrong, thought it was just a team going to say ah okay no helping bob/goons/whoever here so all is cool That was the very old (and seemingly 99% dropped) idea of an "oversight com...
- by Akita T - at 2008.05.03 13:58:00
|
64. T2 BPOs - Should they be taken out of the game? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Uncius manufacturers who try to use t2 invention only to see that price on the market is 200% less than it costs to build t2 item WRONG ! The only reason most desirable items are no longer profitable to invent is the ...
- by Akita T - at 2008.05.03 13:37:00
|
65. T2 BPOs - Should they be taken out of the game? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
T2 BPOs - Should they be taken out of the game ? NO. There's plenty of good reasons for them to stay, and absolutely no GOOD reason why they should go.
- by Akita T - at 2008.05.03 13:34:00
|
66. Skill change stances - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
If anything, I'd be in favor of reducing the "Level V" prerequisites (all of them) to "Level IV" prerequisites, making "L5s" completely optional for absolutely everybody. Then I'd go ahead and introduce a lot of "specialisation" skills for a lot o...
- by Akita T - at 2008.05.03 12:42:00
|
67. A Radical Proposal - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Akita T on 03/05/2008 08:55:50 Originally by: Herb Philbrik My radical proposal is this: either ban ALL CCP employees and relatives from any 0.0 alliances, or from the game entirely. That's crazy talk ! One of the bet...
- by Akita T - at 2008.05.03 08:51:00
|
68. Candidates, Lets Talk Suicide Ganking and Insurance - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
If suicide gankers would get no insurance at all, the cost of suicide-ganking would go so high that you'd virtually have no more suicide-ganks at all (or only on especially crazy/careless haulers). That's just as bad as having too much suicide-gan...
- by Akita T - at 2008.05.03 07:54:00
|
69. Candidates: Low sec vs 0.0 "Risk vs Reward" balance - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Akita T on 01/05/2008 09:45:34 Originally by: Venkul Mul Would you (intended as the whole category of people that campaign this kind of change, not you in particular) stop trying to balance this around the players that can a...
- by Akita T - at 2008.05.01 09:42:00
|
70. Voters: Are you campaigning? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I still have to find that one candidate that I really like above all the others 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 .
- by Akita T - at 2008.04.30 16:59:00
|
71. Candidates: Low sec vs 0.0 "Risk vs Reward" balance - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
You have to identify the actual problems first. Highsec is more or less fine the way it is, maybe L4s in highsec are a tad bit too lucrative. As such, I would simply propose skewing the ISK/LP rewards way down for (L4) highsec "kill" missions, ...
- by Akita T - at 2008.04.30 13:33:00
|
72. [CSM Request] Alternative Character Listing - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Ray McCormack Will CCP be releasing a verified list of candidates' alternative character names across all accounts? Since the CSM application process said that you can even create a brand new character in order to run fo...
- by Akita T - at 2008.04.30 02:40:00
|
73. Candidates: The future of tech 2 bpo - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Arithron Its in the 'Reasons to remove T2 BPO' section. Essentially, if I understand the argument correctly, the T2 BPO aren't needed to keep up supply as more BPC can be invented and built from in a month than items built f...
- by Akita T - at 2008.04.29 23:18:00
|
74. Candidates: The future of tech 2 bpo - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Deconstructing the "cons": * Certain Corps or Alliances have a monopoly on certain T2 items and the lower price cap (due to the ability to improve ME) and faster production rate (from improving PE) means that they can make good profit and sell be...
- by Akita T - at 2008.04.29 22:11:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |